“Instead of traditional salespeople, Palantir has what it calls forward deployed engineers. These are…”

“”Instead of traditional salespeople, Palantir has what it calls forward deployed engineers. These are the sometimes awkward computer scientists most companies avoid putting in front of customers. Karp figures that engineers will always tell the truth about the pros and cons of a product, know how to solve problems, and build up a strong reputation with customers over time. “If your life or your economic future is on the line,” he says, “and there is one company where people are maybe kind of suffering from Asperger’s syndrome, but they have always been accurate, you end up trusting them.””

Palantir, the War on Terror’s Secret Weapon – BusinessWeek

Continue reading

Tough questions for believers

Piet over at Freethinker.nl has posted a set of questions for believers.

These are brutal questions and a superb indictment of uncritical thinking.

I would love to see someone attempt to actually answer them all!

Nice work, Piet.

Here is the English translation:


Original Dutch here:


Egyptian versus Greek Protesters

Watching this footage of Egyptian protesters fighting their police show the how different protesting-rioting is when confronting armed police who use live ammunition.

The police are too far away for their petrol bombs being thrown at then to get anywhere near them. Same story with the stones. The protesters however are easily within range of the tear-gas launchers and rubber bullets.

If they get too close, or look like actually hitting the police with firebombs, they would be shot dead.

Contrast this with Greece, where the rioters get very close to the police, routinely hitting officers directly with firebombs.

Greek anarchists think they are tough guys because the work they can expect is tear-gassing and truncheon blows. Egyptian (and Syrian, and Bahraini) protesters risk life and limb to protest.

They are truly brave, unlike their anarchist fellows in Greece.

Child rape and Multiculturalism

Over the last few months I have been tracking a truly grim story in The Times. Unfortunately the stories are inaccessible behind their paywall (I get it on my Kindle).

The story is about the massive scale grooming, rape and sexual abuse of underage white girls by Pakistani Muslim gangs in the UK.

The number of victims is in the tens if not hundreds of thousands. They victims are usually between the ages of 11 and 16 (i.e. children) They are seduced by gang members who ply them with alcohol and drugs. They then rape them (sometime gang rape them), and in many cases prostitute them to friends, family and others in their communities.

The stories are harrowing. Not only are these kids brutally abused, but when their families have tried to stop it, they have been victimised and abused too.

Some seized on the abuse as an example of sexual warfare waged on infidel girls by Muslims who have zero respect for miniskirt wearing whores as they see them. There is little evidence that there is a cultural element even though The Time quotes at least some who claimed these little girls were asking for it:

Two young Pakistanis in South Yorkshire recently spoke of some girls “going for £10”, adding: “The younger the girl, it’s easy to take advantage ‘cos when they’re 18, 19, they don’t really fall for little things like that. If she’s a virgin they get the pleasure of taking her virginity. You see the girls walk around in bloody miniskirts … they just ask for it.” – “Judges told to protect victims in abuse cases” Richard Ford; Andrew Norfolk | 560 words (The Times – Tue 22nd Nov 2011)

One of the worst things about this story is that this abuse has gone on since the 90’s, with police and social services doing little or nothing because they were afraid of being branded racists.

These children were sacrificed at the alter of multiculturalism.

If police and social workers could not stop child rape – arguably the kost despicable crime after murder – then one must assume that there is no lie to large, no behaviour to disgusting to serve the multicultural lie.

The stories – and there are thousands – are almost to horrible to believe. Girls as young as 11 being gang raped, impregnated, being forced to have abortions, pimped, beaten and otherwise brutalised.

Here is an extracts from the Time article from last Monday called “Raped, pimped and driven to despair: the 16-year-old girl failed at every turn Andrew Norfolk | 2537 words (The Times  Monday 21st Nov 2011) :

Four months after her 16th birthday, Chloe jumped from a bridge above the M1. There was no safety net. In her life, there never had been. Motorists swerved to avoid the broken body then waited for the emergency services. Chloe failed. She broke five bones in her back, shattered both feet and spent two months in Leeds General Infirmary, but she survived.

Her story is told for the first time today, along with those of five other girls from West Yorkshire, aged between 12 to 16, victims during the past two years of men who used alcohol and drugs to groom and exploit teenagers for sex. To search for what led Chloe to that flyover is to go back to a February night in 2009 when the 15-year-old was invited to a birthday party. She was in the garden when a takeaway delivery driver pulled up and persuaded her to go for a ride. Asian and in his twenties, he drove to a secluded spot and raped her.

…At a party that summer she was shocked to see the same driver [called PK]. In her mother’s words, “when he got his claws into her” this time, she told no one. By September, there were mornings when Chloe was dropped at her Leeds school, to be collected by a waiting PK. She was drinking heavily, using Ecstasy and heroin and paying for it by having sex with a dealer who made her dependent on him and his wares.

…In January, Chloe had discovered that she was pregnant. She went to tell the father, PK, of her decision to keep the baby and that she wanted to break free of drugs and to make a new start. His response was to drag her into a bedroom and rape her before inviting his friends to join in. It was the prelude to an assault in which the men repeatedly kicked her in the stomach. She was held overnight then driven to a backstreet abortionist. Chloe told no one but a few days later went to her school on drugs and out of control. She was arrested, held in cells overnight then released without charge. She went home that evening, January 28, kissed her sleeping sister and left the house. At 11.25pm, she jumped from the bridge.

Her mother rushed to the hospital to be met by police officers who asked if she knew why Chloe might have attempted suicide. She mentioned the original rape, the only sexual offence she knew about, and said she was told “we haven’t got that in our records”. Chloe was by now under the care of the child and adolescent mental health service in Leeds. Her mother was not told of the meeting in February at which professionals decided to hold a second one a month later. In March, her support worker visited hospital. According to project records, Chloe “said that the reason she had jumped was that she had been gang raped by a group of adult Asian men”.

She is just one of tens of thousands. Same story every time. Pubescent girls lured into relationships with older British Pakistani men. Raped, pimped and abused by those men.

From Judges told to protect victims in abuse cases Richard Ford; Andrew Norfolk | 560 words (The Times – Tue 22nd Nov 2011)

The Times’s investigations have exposed a world in which cars, drugs and alcohol are the doorway to a criminal sub-culture that seeks to alienate children from family and friends. Young teenagers may think they are in love but as their dependence grows they are often passed to other men to be abused in cars, parks, cheap hotels and empty, “chill pad” properties. Some girls have been driven to different parts of the country for sex. Parties are held at which children are shared by the men among friends and older relatives. Sometimes, but not always, money changes hands.

A great lead article in The Time yesterday challenges us to face up to this horror, and bin the sensitivities that have allowed it to go on for so long.  From “The Case for Honesty”, The Times,  (Web 23rd Nov 2011)

In these pages for the past several days we have carried case after case where underage girls were known to be being raped by local men, and yet nothing was done to prevent the crime or prosecute the criminals.

Nothing, despite the fact that parents were sometimes documenting what was going on.

There are some difficulties for the authorities in dealing with cases where the victims may regard their abusers as friends or benefactors. But this alone cannot explain the inaction.

We know that Anne Cryer, the former Labour MP for Keighley, raised the issue in 2003, and was widely condemned for doing so. We know that in May 2004 Channel 4 agreed to postpone a documentary at the request of the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire because it featured social workers dealing with grooming cases in Bradford, and he was worried that it would create unrest in the run-up to the local elections.

When it was shown it was attacked in some quarters for giving succour to the British National Party. Different networks and groups are exploiting teenagers, in a range of ways. They involve many kinds of men: many are white, many are not. An assessment commissioned by the Government this year found that of those offenders whose ethnicity was known, half were Asian.

All offenders are perpetrating a disgusting crime. But in January, when The Times analysed grooming cases before the courts and disclosed that the majority of defendants were Asian men, we were attacked for doing so. Some professionals argued for fuller studies. Others said that we were perpetrating a slur on innocent communities.

This is a dangerously complacent psychology.

In admitting that gang grooming is present in certain communities, one no more stigmatises the entire community than one believes most vicars are choirboy abusers, or all men are rapists. But not admitting the truth makes it harder to deal with what is happening, and this helps racists as well as condemning children to abuse. Action plans are fine. Ministerial fulmination is good too. But honesty about what is going on is the essential condition for ending a terrible national scandal.


Read more:


Lies about lying

On a recent series of flights to Las Vegas (18 hours in the air!) I finished Sam Harris’s new book “Lying“.

The book is a manifesto for truth-telling and as such reminds me of Brad Blandon’s classic “Radical Honesty“.

Both books argue persuasively that lying (“to intentionally mislead others when they expect honest communication”) is both morally wrong and deleterious.

Of the two books, Blandon’s is the more aggressive, but both insist that one must always be honest, even if it means apparent harm to others will come of it.

I do not have my cliff notes from Radical Honesty, but here are my clippings from Harris’ “Lying”:

“People lie so that others will form beliefs that are not true. The more consequential the beliefs—that is, the more a person’s well-being depends upon a correct understanding of the world—the more consequential the lie.”

“The intent to communicate honestly is the measure of truthfulness…It is in believing one thing while intending to communicate another that every lie is born.”

“Once one commits to telling the truth, one begins to notice how unusual it is to meet someone who shares this commitment. Honest people are a refuge: You know they mean what they say; you know they will not say one thing to your face and another behind your back; you know they will tell you when they think you have failed—and for this reason their praise cannot be mistaken for mere flattery.”

“Honesty is a gift we can give to others. It is also a source of power and an engine of simplicity. Knowing that we will attempt to tell the truth, whatever the circumstances, leaves us with little to prepare for. We can simply be ourselves.”

“It can take practice to feel comfortable with this way of being in the world—to cancel plans, decline invitations, critique others’ work, etc., all while being honest about what one is thinking and feeling. To do this is also to hold a mirror up to one’s life—because a commitment to telling the truth requires that one pay attention to what the truth is in every moment. What sort of person are you? How judgemental, self-interested, or petty have you become?”

“While we imagine that we tell certain lies out of compassion for others, it is rarely difficult to spot the damage we do in the process. By lying, we deny our friends access to reality—and their resulting ignorance often harms them in ways we did not anticipate. Our friends may act on our falsehoods, or fail to solve problems that could have been solved only on the basis of good information. Rather often, to lie is to infringe upon the freedom of those we care about.”

“False encouragement is a kind of theft: it steals time, energy, and motivation a person could put toward some other purpose.”

“A wasteland of embarrassment and social upheaval can be neatly avoided by following a single precept in life: Do not lie.”

“This is among the many corrosive effects of having unjust laws: They tempt peaceful and (otherwise) honest people to lie so as to avoid being punished for behavior that is ethically blameless.”

“What does it mean to have integrity? It means many things, of course, but one criterion is to avoid behavior that readily leads to shame or remorse. The ethical terrain here extends well beyond the question of honesty—but to truly have integrity, we must not feel the need to lie about our personal lives. To lie is to erect a boundary between the truth we are living and the perception others have of us. The temptation to do this is often born of an understanding that others will disapprove of our behavior.”

“Vulnerability comes in pretending to be someone you are not.”

“An unhappy truth of human psychology is probably also at work here, which makes it hard to abolish lies once they have escaped into the world: We seem to be predisposed to remember statements as true even after they have been disconfirmed.”

“Lying is, almost by definition, a refusal to cooperate with others. It condenses a lack of trust and trustworthiness into a single act. It is both a failure of understanding and an unwillingness to be understood. To lie is to recoil from relationship. ”

“By lying, we deny others a view of the world as it is. Our dishonesty not only influences the choices they make, it often determines the choices they can make—and in ways we cannot always predict. Every lie is a direct assault upon the autonomy of those we lie to. And by lying to one person, we potentially spread falsehoods to many others—even to whole societies. We also force upon ourselves subsequent choices—to maintain the deception or not—that can complicate our lives. In this way, every lie haunts our future. There is no telling when or how it might collide with reality, requiring further maintenance. The truth never needs to be tended in this way. It can simply be reiterated.”

When I arrived back from Las Vegas, I was catching up with the fine reads on The Browser, and came across a great article on this very topic.

In a piece called, “7 Things Happen to You When You Are Completely Honest“, James Altucher explores the consequences of living a truthful life.

His advice is saner that Harris and Blandon.  He warns of the following consequences:


His advice is lovely though:

“My own personal motto is: honesty to a point. I will never harm anyone. I believe in what Buddha said to his son Rahula the day after he showed up after abandoning his son for 7 years:

before, during, and even AFTER you say something, make sure it doesn’t hurt anyone.

But even despite that rule, people will stop speaking to you because not every hurt you can control. Historical is hysterical for many people.”

In his final section, “#7 You become free”, he writes:

“At first we hug our boundaries in chains. We think “if we tell the girl we like her, she might not like me back”. We think, “If I say I like this candidate, my friends might hate me.” If I say X, everyone else might say Y. And so on. But more and more we start to feel where those boundaries are and we push them out. We push them further and further away from ourselves. Until finally they are so far away it’s as if they don’t exist at all. You don’t need money for that. Or a big house. Or a fancy degree or car. Every day, just push out those boundaries a little further.

We reach for that freedom. We never truly get there. We’re always striving to see how far they can go, just like a little child with her parents. But eventually, the boundaries are so far away we begin to feel the pleasures of true freedom.”

Finally, just tonight, I came across two stories in the Economist on the subject of lying and how technology can peek inside the mind.

The terrible truth: Technology can now see what people are thinking. Be afraid

Mind-goggling: It is now possible to scan someone’s brain and get a reasonable idea of what is going through his mind

Bon Iver’s “Calgary”

One of my absolute fave albums of 2011 has been Bon Iver’s “Bon Iver”.

Yesterday I saw the music video to Calgary, and thought it worth sharing.

The video features the beautifully named (and looking) model Raina Hein. It was filmed in Fall Creek, Wisconsin, the video was written by Bon Iver mastermind Justin Vernon and directed by Andre Durand and Dan Huiting.

[Thanks ONTD]