Minority chauvinists

by jonathan on September 23, 2012

Reading a Jim Goad piece in Taki mag got me thinking about a genuine oddity in contemporary Western culture: The existence of minority chauvinists who tirelessly campaign either exclusively for their own people or against whites, yet instead of being cast into the same bin as white nationalists, they are feted, funded and lauded.

Take Verenice Gutierrez, an school principle and anti-white campaigner, who recently earned national attention by banning peanut butter sandwiches as discriminatory against non-whites

Portland grade-school principal Verenice Gutierrez…presides over a school whose academic performance ranks in the state’s lowest fifteen percent.

Although the school recently lost some full-time teachers due to budget cuts, the Portland school district reportedly saw fit to fork over more than a half-million dollars to indoctrinate its teachers about how “white privilege”—rather than, say, low IQs, laziness, or widespread cultural allergies to assimilating—is the culprit for low academic achievement at her school, which is only one-quarter white

Gutierrez, whom a Portland Tribune writer described as possessing the magical power to hear “the subtle language of racism every day,” says that peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwiches invidiously discriminate against “Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches.” She apparently hasn’t considered that these kids may be extremely privileged by dint of the fact that they don’t live in Somalia or Mexico.

When confronted with the fact that a parent complained that Gutierrez permits a drum club at the school whose membership is open only to black and Hispanic males, she scoffed and said:

“When white people do it, it is not a problem, but if it’s for kids of color, then it’s a problem? Break it down for me. That’s your white privilege and your whiteness.”

I was unaware that American whites, especially schoolchildren, are permitted to “do it” at all, but if they did attempt to form any school-sponsored organization open exclusively to whites, it would not only be a “problem,” it’d be a headline-grabbing national scandal. Such is the state of modern “white privilege.”

…During her tenure at another Portland public school, Gutierrez was involved with a group called Future Hispanic Leaders. On a 17-minute video, she spoke of fomenting “pride of culture, pride of heritage, and pride of language” to “empower” Hispanic students to feel “that they belong with others who look just like them.”

Imagine is a white principle, in a majority white school creating whites only school clubs and calling on white students to foment price of culture, heritage and language to empower them to feel that they belong with people who look just like them?!

Heart of Darkness by Conrad, Joseph

{ 0 comments }

““In some cases, many in fact, the enemy does the planning for you.” - Barrett Brown”

- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klvP1Xx6OH4

{ 0 comments }

The 10 wastes of IT

by jonathan on September 11, 2012

From Mike Orzen ( @MikeOrzenLeanIT ) comes a solid post on the 10 wastes of IT:

  1. Overproduction
  2. Over-processing
  3. Defects
  4. Over-engineering
  5. Inventory
  6. Transportation
  7. Waiting
  8. Motion
  9. Unused creativity
  10. Technical Debt

From: http://itrevolution.com/the-7-wastes-of-devops/

{ 0 comments }

The Power of Networks

by jonathan on September 3, 2012

A new video from the lovely RSA Animate team, this time on the Power of Networks.  

Introduced me to the concept of “Rhizome“:

Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari use the term “rhizome” and “rhizomatic” to describe theory and research that allows for multiple, non-hierarchical entry and exit points in data representation and interpretation. In A Thousand Plateaus, they oppose it to an arborescent conception of knowledge, which works with dualist categories and binary choices. A rhizome works with planar and trans-species connections, while an arborescent model works with vertical and linear connections. Their use of the “orchid and the wasp” is taken from the biological concept of mutualism, in which two different species interact together to form a multiplicity (i.e. a unity that is multiple in itself). Horizontal gene transfer would also be a good illustration.

As a model for culture, the rhizome resists the organizational structure of the root-tree system which charts causality along chronological lines and looks for the original source of “things” and looks towards the pinnacle or conclusion of those “things.” A rhizome, on the other hand, is characterized by “ceaselessly established connections between semiotic chains, organizations of power, and circumstances relative to the arts, sciences, and social struggles.” The rhizome presents history and culture as a map or wide array of attractions and influences with no specific origin or genesis, for a “rhizome has no beginning or end; it is always in the middle, between things, interbeing, intermezzo.” The planar movement of the rhizome resists chronology and organization, instead favoring a nomadic system of growth and propagation. In this model, culture spreads like the surface of a body of water, spreading towards available spaces or trickling downwards towards new spaces through fissures and gaps, eroding what is in its way. The surface can be interrupted and moved, but these disturbances leave no trace, as the water is charged with pressure and potential to always seek its equilibrium, and thereby establish smooth space. – Wikipedia 

 

{ 0 comments }

““The only effective way to deal with bad speech is more speech and better speech to drown out the bad speech in the sea of ideas and not to jail or harass the speaker”.”

- Alan Dershowitz

{ 0 comments }

“Go South you f*cking whore”

by jonathan on August 23, 2012

Over at The Outlander I discuss our first brush with ethnic hostility since moving to Denmark.

{ 0 comments }

Here, but not here

by jonathan on August 23, 2012

David Strom makes an interesting observation in this week’s Web Informant newsletter  (August 21, 2012: The dichotomy of virtual friendship). 

I had a meeting yesterday that drove home the dichotomy of our virtual connections. It was supposed to be a standard have-a-drink-to-meet-the-vendor-after-the-conference kind of thing, a chance to see a new company (who will remain nameless) at the Gartner
Catalyst show that I am attending and covering for HP’s Input/Output website this week in San Diego.

I had never met anyone from the vendor, nor my intended companion, but both sounded interesting. He brought along his chief nerd and the meeting started falling apart quickly, as Mr. N (let’s call him that) proceeded to fiddle with his iPad. I thought he was queuing up a
presentation or a demo for me, so I didn’t give it much thought.

But then I noticed something odd: as long as I was talking to my companion, the marcom guy, N wasn’t part of the conversation. When I asked a technical question, N immediately piped up with an extended and quite cogent answer. It was as if he was present in two different places: online (or in iSpace, or whatever he was doing with his tablet) and in the here and now, part of my press briefing. It was a bit offputting, to say the least.

It became clear that N was socially inept, perhaps somewhere that could be diagnosed, and didn’t want to be part of my briefing. He also brought along his smartphone, and just as I thought I would get at least a nanosecond of his direct attention, he picked that up and started messing with that.

In all of my years of taking these kinds of meetings, this was a new one for me.

It brought home the point: Never have we have so connected virtually and so removed when we are in person.

I have seen this plenty. It’s a common affliction in the tech industry, especially at conferences. People lurk on the periphery, passive monitoring, and activate their attention to the present situation only when their filter detects a cue for them to contribute.  

I actually think this is behaviour from conference calls carried over into real life. 

Due to poor meeting discipline, so many people on conference calls are unneeded, most put on mute and crack on with their workday, paying minimal “continuous partial attention” to the discussion. 

When they are questioned directly or hear something they want to comment on, their attention snaps to the call. 

How often have you heard someone being addressed on a conference call, only to have dead air as they scramble to unmute and try to recall what was just being discussed?

Attention really is the gold (or Tulips) of the 21st century. 

{ 0 comments }

2001: A Space Odyssey (2012 Trailer Recut) (by MoviesWithFSR)

by LimbicNutrition Shorts on August 10, 2012



2001: A Space Odyssey (2012 Trailer Recut) (by MoviesWithFSR)

{ 0 comments }

Noise and Signal in a data drowned world

by LimbicNutrition Shorts on August 8, 2012

Noise and Signal in a data drowned world

{ 0 comments }

Why aren’t Neo-Communists as loathed as Neo-Nazis?

by LimbicNutrition Shorts on August 8, 2012

Why aren't Neo-Communists as loathed as Neo-Nazis?

{ 0 comments }