Paris Hilton exposed

By now the latest Paris Hilton privacy invasion is well under way.

A website called ParisExposed.com is advertising the fact that last year they legally acquired 6000sq feet of her private possessions after she defaulted in the storage bill.

The collection involved thousands of photos, videos, diaries and private records.

These have now been made public via the website and it seems that it is yet more utter humiliation for the heiress.

The fact that these have been made public genuinely disgusts me. It one thing for a storage depot to sell off good to recoup their expenses, it is quite another to violate someone’s privacy to such a shocking extent.

Imagine if someone managed to get every single of one your private records, photos, videos and letters then proceeded to publish every one of them on the web?

It is a form of malicious victimisation – bullying – and should be avenged as such.

If I were Ms Hilton I would throw considerable amounts if my fortune into creative ways to counter-humiliate the owners of the website.

I would hire people to sift their trash, photograph them on vacation, subpoena their photos & videos (then publish them). I would set aside a few million to hire private investigator to spend the rest of the target’s life doing everything in their power to find and publicise humiliating material on them.

She should use her money to make them rue the day they decided to profit from her humiliation.

Ms Hilton, I am at your service if you require my skills as a misery maker.

Protect the gifted to protect your culture

From Aztecs vs. Greeks by Charles Murray

If “intellectually gifted” is defined to mean people who can become theoretical physicists, then we’re talking about no more than a few people per thousand and perhaps many fewer. They are cognitive curiosities, too rare to have that much impact on the functioning of society from day to day. But if “intellectually gifted” is defined to mean people who can stand out in almost any profession short of theoretical physics, then research about IQ and job performance indicates that an IQ of at least 120 is usually needed. That number demarcates the top 10% of the IQ distribution, or about 15 million people in today’s labor force — a lot of people.

In professions screened for IQ by educational requirements — medicine, engineering, law, the sciences and academia — the great majority of people must, by the nature of the selection process, have IQs over 120. Evidence about who enters occupations where the screening is not directly linked to IQ indicates that people with IQs of 120 or higher also occupy large proportions of positions in the upper reaches of corporate America and the senior ranks of government. People in the top 10% of intelligence produce most of the books and newspaper articles we read and the television programs and movies we watch. They are the people in the laboratories and at workstations who invent our new pharmaceuticals, computer chips, software and every other form of advanced technology.

Combine these groups, and the top 10% of the intelligence distribution has a huge influence on whether our economy is vital or stagnant, our culture healthy or sick, our institutions secure or endangered. Of the simple truths about intelligence and its relationship to education, this is the most important and least acknowledged: Our future depends crucially on how we educate the next generation of people gifted with unusually high intelligence.

Amazing oldies rock the house

From The Good New Network

Imagine an elderly choral group of singers aged 73-100. Now imagine that group belting out songs by the Rolling Stones, The Clash or Talking Heads. Meet The American Young @ Heart Chorus. It was started in 1982 by seniors in a home for the aged in Northampton, Massachusetts, and included elders who’d lived through both World Wars.

My favourite is their cover of “Fix You” by Coldplay (below), but you must check out their cover of The Ramones’, “I Want to Be Sedated.” (see it at the link).