Interesting read. One VERY telling comment from our young radical. Something the appeasers need to understand. When appeasers say it is our fault that Islamists attack us because we helped invade Iraq or are allies with America or whatever (some actually repeat Osama Bin Laden’s very own rhetorical question “Why did we not attack Sweden?” as though Sweden is safe because it does not support the USA or Britain, just like it did not support them during WWII) this ought to sober them up. From Prospect Magazine:
Taseer: Clearly you have a sense of an enemy. What is the face of this enemy? Is it America?
Butt: At the moment, America.
Taseer: Who else is part of it?
Butt: You have an apparent enemy and a hidden enemy. Taseer: The apparent enemy?
Butt: The American enemy. As far as I’m concerned, you have America spearheading the attack, followed by Britain, France, the EU [Note: Sorry Sweden, looks like you are for it after all], the UN, the World Bank, the IMF…
Taseer: India?
Butt: India.
Taseer: Thailand?
Butt: Thailand, especially after what happened recently. [Attacks on Muslim rebels in the south of the country]
Taseer: What does it take to join the enemy?
Butt: To support them. The Japanese only have 500 troops in Iraq; as a result they’ve declared war on Islam. China from day one has been testing its nuclear missiles in the Xinjiang province; it’s a Muslim province, so China is another enemy of Islam. As far as we’re concerned, until an Islamic government makes treaties with these people, the world, for me, is an enemy. But there will be people who we prioritise, so I won’t start attacking the South American states. I have bigger and more important enemies to deal with, those who are having direct influence in the Muslim world, like America.
There you have it. First we take on the Big Fighters – like the USA and Britain then we mop up the cowards, appeasers and neutrals (South America, Sweden).
